Skip to Navigation
 

The Grasslands

Site Facts

Country, State, Province/Region:

United States, California

Relative Location:

Fresno and Merced Counties

Latitude/Longitude:

-120.847W, 37.057N

Category:

International

Basis for Designation:

More than 100,000 shorebirds annually.

Size:

78,476 hectares (193,918 acres)

Joined:

December 1992

Site Owner/Steward:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Game and Fish, Private Landowners

Site Partners:

California Waterfowl Associate, Ducks Unlimited, Inc. Sierra Club, National Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Campaign to Save California Wetlands, Wilderness

Human Population within 100 km:

1,887,000

Contact:

Outreach and Outdoor Recreation Planner
San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex
Los Banos, CA
jack_sparks@fws.gov

General Manager
Grasslands Resource Conservation District
Los Banos
rortega@gwdwater.org 

 Description

The Grasslands is one of the most important shorebird habitats in the western United States.   California’s Central Valley hosts one of the largest wintering shorebird populations of any inland site in western North America. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands has designated the Grasslands as a wetland of international importance and the Manomet Center’s Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network (WHSRN) has designated the Grasslands Ecological Area of the San Joaquin Basin as a site of international importance to shorebirds.

Wetlands in California’s Central Valley have declined from roughly 4,000,000 acres in the 1800’s to just over 205,000 managed wetland acres in 2006; the Grasslands contains about a third of these remaining wetlands.  Dominated by intensively managed seasonal and semi-permanent palustrine emergent marsh, Grasslands habitats also include riparian wetlands, permanent marsh, alkali scrub, native grassland, and pastoral lands.  These important wildlife habitats are managed under a mosaic of federal, state, and private ownerships.

Nearly 50% of all the shorebirds in California’s Central Valley are found in the Grasslands during the mid-April peak of spring migration.  The Grasslands hosts up to 200,000 shorebirds during spring (predominantly Western Sandpipers, Long-billed Dowitchers, Dunlins, and Least Sandpipers), 14,000 shorebirds during autumn (Long-billed Dowitchers, Least Sandpipers, Black-necked Stilts, and Least and Western Sandpipers), and 60,000 shorebirds in  winter (mostly Long-billed Dowitchers, Dunlins, Least Sandpipers, and Black-necked Stilts) according to Pacific Flyway Project censuses conducted by the Point Reyes Bird Observatory.  

The Grasslands is also a critically important wintering area for Pacific Flyway waterfowl, with peak annual numbers of ducks and geese ranging from 800,000 to 1,000,000 during the last ten years, and provides habitat for 46 plant and animal species with federal or state endangered, threatened, or candidate status. 

 

Ecology & Conservation

Overview:

The San Joaquin Basin is 80 miles long and covers 2,900 square miles.  It extends from the Stanislaus River in the north, to the San Joaquin River in the south. The basin is bordered on the west by the California Aqueduct and on the east by the foothills of the Sierra Nevada.  Major tributaries to the San Joaquin River include the Chowchilla, Merced, and Tuolumne Rivers.  Most private wetlands as well as several federal and state managed areas in the San Joaquin Basin are located in the Grassland Resource Conservation District (GRCD) on the western side of the basin. 

Habitat Description:

Wetlands in the Grasslands include freshwater marshes, riparian woodlands, and vernal pools.  The rivers and sloughs support vast freshwater marshlands dominated by aquatic and emergent vegetation―rushes, bulrushes (tules), sedges, and cattails―and fringed with willows, cottonwoods, and a variety of shrubs.  Riparian wetlands include rivers, creeks, and streams and their plant communities, most notably woody vegetation.  Vernal pools form where natural depressions occur in non-porous soils and are seasonally flooded by winter rains.  When the rains stop, the water eventually evaporates. These ephemeral wetlands remain flooded long enough to prevent typical grassland vegetation from taking hold, resulting in a unique assemblage of plants and animals, some of which are found nowhere else.  

Upland areas adjacent wetlands also provide forage, loafing areas, thermal cover, and nesting habitat for a variety of migratory bird species.  Upland habitats include not only native grassland and alkali scrub, but grain and hay crops, and grazed or ungrazed pasture.  Some harvested cornfields are intentionally flooded to provide waterfowl and waterbird habitat.

Shorebird Highlights:

Common shorebird sightings in the Grasslands include: black-necked stilts and killdeer year-round; greater yellowlegs, long-billed curlews, least sandpipers, dunlin, and long-billed dowitchers from autumn through spring; American avocets and Black-bellied plover during the cool, wet winter and spring; and lesser yellowlegs and Wilson’s snipe in the fall and winter.  Western sandpipers are common, while whimbrels and short-billed dowitchers are occasionally seen during fall and spring migrations.  Rare sightings include solitary sandpipers, willets, spotted sandpipers, marbled godwits, pectoral sandpipers, Wilson’s and red-necked phalaropes. 

Other Important Wildlife:

The Grasslands is the winter home for large portions of the Pacific Flyway populations of many species of waterfowl, waterbirds, raptors, and songbirds.  The majority of Aleutian cackling geese winter here as well as thousands of greater white-fronted geese, snow geese, and Ross’s geese.  Quantities of northern pintails, wood ducks, and sandhill cranes are among the more notable sights. 

It is also the year-round home of a number of endangered, threatened, and candidate species, unique endemics, and other species of special concern, including the riparian brush rabbit, San Joaquin Valley kit fox, tule elk, Fresno kangaroo rat, San Joaquin pocket mouse, giant garter snake, San Joaquin whipsnake, Pacific pond turtle, tri-colored blackbird, yellow-billed magpie, Nuttall’s woodpecker, western yellow-billed cuckoo, yellow-breasted chat, Valley elderberry longhorn beetle and a number of unique vernal pool species of fairy shrimp and tadpole shrimp. 

Impacts and Disturbance:  

Agricultural and urban development have destroyed or modified more than 95% of the historic wetlands and over 90% of all riparian habitats in the Central Valley, Two thirds of those remaining wetlands are in private ownership.

Virtually all Central Valley habitats have been altered.  Over 526 species of introduced plant species are known from California, and many of these occur in the Central Valley’s Grasslands.  In most habitats native taxa comprise less than 1 percent of the standing grassland crop. Introduced annual grasses now dominate grassland habitats.  Agricultural development, urban expansion, alteration of hydrologic regimes and channelization, grazing by domestic livestock, fires, and introduced plants and animals have all contributed to the pervasive destruction of native habitats. 

Intensive agricultural development has left few freshwater marshlands, and those that are left are generally degraded and heavily managed for duck production, water impoundments, or runoff and effluent storage. Dams, channelization of rivers, and pollution continue to threaten the unusual and productive freshwater biodiversity of the region.

Out of 416 km2 of remaining riparian woodland, only about 40 km2 or 1% percent of original riparian woodlands can be considered intact. Channelization, dams, clearing for pasture, flood control, alien plants, overgrazing by domestic livestock, fires, and logging have all taken their toll. 

An estimated 11,310 km2 (2.8 million acres or 66%) of vernal pools have been destroyed, with the most intact pools left on the higher terraces. Agriculture, conversion to pastureland, water diversion and channelization, and draining have all taken their toll on these unique habitats. The USFWS has just begun an ecosystem recovery plan for over 40 species dependent upon vernal pools. 

Remaining patches of relatively undisturbed native habitats are severely fragmented and isolated.  Loss of habitat linkages are likely to be most significant for species that rely on contiguous riparian woodlands for dispersal corridors, such as migratory warblers, cuckoos, reptiles, and amphibians.

Shorebirds in the Grasslands currently rely on a variety of habitats to meet their food energy needs, including evaporation and sewage ponds which may expose them to concentrated contaminants like selenium, or increase the probability of disease transmission.

Threats to Habitat:

The Grasslands is threatened with loss of habitat quantity and quality by urban encroachment, conversion to intensive agriculture and industry, water availability, pollution, alteration of hydrologic regimes, channelization, fires, invasive species, high operation and maintenance costs, and threats to eliminate waterfowl hunting which supports wetland habitat.  Populations of the tri-colored blackbird are declining precipitously due to loss of breeding habitat and changes in agricultural practices. Many amphibian species show dramatic declines associated with habitat loss. Extensive riparian forests and woodlands have been destroyed by decades of tree-cutting, channelization, and flood-control projects. Salinization, toxic runoff, and erosion from ecologically-unsound agricultural practices increasingly degrade habitats. 

Water availability is the #1 concern; without water there is no wetland.  The Central Valley Project Improvement Act approved by the U.S. Congress in 1992 provides some of the Grasslands with a reliable water supply. However, the long-term status of this legislation is threatened by other interests.  Additional threats to the Grasslands water supply and management includes competition with municipal water providers and proposed restrictions to wetland restoration and water uses.  Securing firm, reliable water supplies for managed wetlands in the Central Valley will become even more challenging in the future.  Demand for limited water supplies continues to increase with continued population growth in California, and wetlands compete for a legitimate allocation to meet wetland-dependent resource needs. Some of the most significant barriers to acquiring future water supplies for Central Valley wetlands include: Delta export and pumping constraints; increasing competition to purchase limited water supplies; timing of water use on shared conveyance systems; increasing regulation of managed wetland water discharge; capacity limitations of existing water delivery systems; lack of balance between supply and demand; cost of acquiring annual and long-term water supplies; current and future, state, federal, and private budget shortfalls that impact acquisition efforts;  the State of California’s ability to meet their 25% cost-share obligations under the CVPIA; unreliable quality and quantity of groundwater supplies; increasing groundwater pumping costs; and annual and long-term water transfers that may adversely affect managed wetlands and fish and wildlife resources.  Groundwater issues including access, poor water quality, overdraft, and subsidence.  Soils on the western side of the San Joaquin Basin are derived from marine sediments that are high in salts and trace elements. Post-harvest irrigation was formerly used to leach these substances from the upper soil, and return flows were used as a wetland water source. Selenium concentrations in this tailwater proved damaging to a wide range of birds and consequently, use of this water has been greatly restricted.  Stricter RWQCB standards for wetland discharges into the San Joaquin River are pending (e.g., boron, methylmercury, salinity, dissolved oxygen and selenium).

Habitat Protection Measures:

Protection is provided to 76% (132,241 acres) of the Grasslands by virtue of federal and state ownership and by private lands with perpetual conservation easements. Of the existing wetlands in the Central Valley, about two thirds are privately owned.  Ensuring that water supplies are attached to the property when protecting managed wetland habitat is a priority.  Federal, state, and private landowner organizations―including the California Waterfowl Association, Ducks Unlimited, Grassland Water District, Grassland Resource Conservation District, California Department of Fish and Game, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service―have identified critical areas that need protection to preserve the wildlife habitat values of the Grasslands. These organizations have developed biological justification documents for establishment of an agricultural buffer zone between the Grasslands and expanding urban areas. 

The Central Valley Joint Venture (CVJV) is one of 17 Joint Venture partnerships in the United States, established under the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, and funded under the annual Interior Appropriations act. The CVJV brings together conservation organizations, public agencies, private landowners and other partners interested in the conservation of bird habitat within California’s Central Valley.  The mission of the Central Valley Joint Venture is to work collaboratively through diverse partnerships to protect, restore, and enhance wetlands and associated habitats for waterfowl, shorebirds, waterbirds, and riparian songbirds, in accordance with conservation actions identified in the Joint Venture’s Implementation Plan.  The 2006 Central Valley Joint Venture Implementation Plan (2006 Plan) allows the Central Valley Joint Venture and its individual partners to examine the habitat needs of various bird groups in the nine basins within the Central Valley, and to formulate and prioritize activities to meet those needs.

Strict protection and restoration of the last remnants of native communities is needed for all valley habitats. 

Management Activities and Priorities:

The Grasslands is intensively managed for wildlife.  The area has a very sophisticated system for water delivery and management. Nearly 90% of all wetlands are managed on a seasonal basis.  Managed wetlands are broadly categorized as seasonal, semi-permanent or permanent. Seasonal wetlands are typically flooded in the fall, with drawdown usually occurring between March and May. Semi-permanent wetlands are usually flooded from early fall through early July, while permanent wetlands are flooded year-round.  

Th e Joint Venture’s assessment of habitat conditions in the Central Valley suggests that shorebird needs may be met by: (1) managing wetlands and agricultural habitats to provide foraging depths <10 cm; and (2) adjusting flooding and draw down schedules of wetlands to meet the needs of wintering shorebirds, especially during July and August.

Population objectives are highest in April, with shorebird numbers reaching a minimum in July. Seasonal wetlands provide the majority of foraging habitat.  Conservation objectives for managed seasonal and semi-permanent wetlands for the San Joaquin Basin are that nearly 66% of the seasonal wetlands present in this planning region (40,130/61,013 acres) must provide foraging depths <10 cm during some portion of the wintering period if seasonal wetland objectives for shorebirds are to be met.

Management of the Grasslands has improved significantly since the inclusion of the Grasslands as an international shorebird reserve. The implementation of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act in 1993, the purchase and restoration of about 2,000 acres of wetlands by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Game, the implementation of the California Waterfowl Habitat Program on 7,447 acres of private lands, continual acquisition of perpetual conservation easements from willing sellers via the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, annual marsh management workshops sponsored by the Grassland Resource Conservation District for private landowners, and technical assistance provided to private wetland owners by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and the Grassland Water District are some of the programs that continue to improve wetland management in the Grasslands.

Research:

The Grasslands hosts a myriad of graduate, doctoral, federal, state, and non-governmental organization research projects on a wide variety of subjects, including wildlife, botany, ecology, contaminants, and management.  

Documents and References:

Central Valley Joint Venture 2006 Implementation Plan

Special Information

Visitor Information and Local Activities:

The San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex (http://www.fws.gov/sanluis/

Wildlife viewing, fishing, hunting, photography, and environmental education are all popular public uses in the Grasslands.  Public use areas at the San Luis NWR Complex are open one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset.  Many interpretive amenities throughout the Complex—including information kiosks, elevated viewing platforms, and interpretive panels along the auto tour routes and nature trails—help visitors understand the importance of the San Joaquin Valley Grasslands to wildlife.  The hunting program is cooperatively administered by the California Department of Fish and Game; information is published in annual federal and state regulation guides.  The Refuge Complex acts as an important outdoor laboratory for schools visiting on field trips; by exploring refuge units, classes of all grade levels integrate the natural world into their classroom lessons.  Field trip, special tours, and speaking programs are available when they can be accommodated – contact the Complex with any requests.

Visitor opportunities at the Refuge Complex include:

San Luis National Wildlife Refuge (http://www.fws.gov/sanluis/sanluis_info.htm

The San Luis NWR has three auto tour routes: a 5.5-mile Waterfowl Tour Route provides viewers with opportunities to see the vast numbers of waterfowl, waterbirds, and shorebirds that make the refuge their winter home; a 5-mile Tule Elk Tour Route takes visitors around an enclosed herd of tule elk where interpretive panels tell the successful story of the tule elks’ struggle against extinction; and a 2 ¼-mile auto tour route at the West Bear Creek Unit provides an intimate view of waterfowl, shorebirds, and riparian songbirds.  Designated areas of the San Luis NWR are open to fishing during daylight hours; the most common species caught are channel catfish, bullhead catfish, striped bass, and black bass.  All anglers must have a current fishing license with proper stamps.

Merced National Wildlife Refuge (http://www.fws.gov/sanluis/merced_info.htm) 

On the Merced National Wildlife Refuge auto tour route, visitors can view thousands of sandhill cranes, snow and Ross’ geese, and a wide variety of other waterfowl, waterbirds, and shorebirds.  

San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge (http://www.fws.gov/sanluis/sanjoaquin_info.htm

Located where the Tuolumne, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Rivers join, the refuge’s focus is on restoring habitat for migratory birds and endangered species. Visitor opportunities are currently restricted to the Beckwith Road observation platform, which provides views of thousands of foraging Aleutian cackling geese, other waterfowl, waterbirds, shorebirds, and raptors.

Great Grasslands State Park (http://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=25155)

The park is located in the San Joaquin Valley some 25 miles west of Merced and is visited mostly by locals who come to fish for bass and catfish from the banks and sand bars of the San Joaquin River.  A native bunchgrass prairie, vernal pools and a slow, lazy length of the river are highlights of the park. Great Grasslands seems even larger than its 2,700 acres because it’s bordered by state and federal wildlife refuges.  By linking a couple of levee roads (closed to vehicles), hikers can fashion a six mile tour of the Great Grassland.  

Los Banos Wildlife Area (http://www.dfg.ca.gov/lands/wa/region4/losbanos.html) 

Purchased in 1929, this area was the first of a series of waterfowl refuges established throughout the state to manage habitat for wintering waterfowl. Expanded from its original 3,000 acres, there are now 6,217 acres of wetland habitat which includes lakes, sloughs and managed marsh. Only designated roads are open to motor vehicles, but with some exceptions, you can walk or bicycle over the whole area. 

Volta Wildlife Area (http://www.dfg.ca.gov/lands/wa/region4/volta.html)

This state run area consists of 2,891 acres of managed marsh and valley alkali shrub. Foot access only, except for permitted hunters during waterfowl season. 

Grassland Environmental Education Center (GEECe) (http://gwdwater.org/geece/)

GEECe was established in 1995 to provide support and education about the Grassland Ecological Area throughout the San Joaquin Valley and California.  GEECe’s mission is to increase awareness and appreciation of wetlands, while recognizing the integral role played by agricultural and sporting interests in establishing and maintaining habitat for wildlife.  It includes in its curriculum for K-6 students recognition of the importance of the Grasslands for shorebirds, waterfowl, and other wetland dependent species.  The GEECe has been moved to the Los Banos Wildlife Area’s Interpretative Marsh, managed by the California Department of Fish and Game and located on Henry Miller Road.  

”Grassland Explorer” is the Grassland wetlands newsletter produced by the Grassland Water District (Address: 22759 S. Mercey Springs Rd., Los Banos, CA 93635) and posted on the web at:  http://gwdwater.org/newsletters/index.php5

Contact

Outreach and Outdoor Recreation Planner
San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex 
P.O. Box 2176 (947 W. Pacheco Blvd., Suite C)
Los Banos, CA 93635
Tel. 209-826-3508
FAX: 209-826-1445
jack_sparks@fws.gov 

General Manager
Grassland Resource Conservation District 
22759 S. Mercey Springs Road
Los Banos, CA 93635
Tel. 209-826-5188
Fax 209-826-4984
Ricardo Ortega: rortega@gwdwater.org

Additional Resouces

Bibliography:

Anderson, D.G. 1956. A waterfowl nesting study on the Grasslands, Merced County, California. California Fish and Game, 42: 117-130.

Central Valley Joint Venture, 2006.  Central Valley Joint Venture Implementation Plan – Conserving Bird Habitat.  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, CA.

Connelly, D.P. 1979. Propagation of selected marsh plants in the San Joaquin Valley. California Department of Fish and Game, Wildlife Management Leaflet 15, Sacramento, 13 pp.

Connelly, D.P., and D. L. Chesemore. 1980. Food habits of pintails, Anas Acuta, wintering on seasonally flooded wetlands in the northern San Joaquin Valley, California. California Fish and Game, 66: 233-237.

Ermacoff, N. 1968. Marsh and habitat management practices at the Mendota Wildlife Area. California Department of Fish and Game, Game Management Leaflet No. 12, 10 pp.

Fredrickson, L.H. and M. Laubhan. 1995. Land Use Impacts and Habitat Preservation in the Grasslands of Western Merced County, California. A report of the Grassland Water District, Los Banos, CA, 81 pp.

George, H.A. 1963. Planting alkali bulrush for waterfowl food. California Department of Fish and Game, Game Management Leaflet 9, Sacramento, 9 pp.

Kjelmyr, J., G. Page, W.D. Shuford, L.E. Stenzel. 1991. Shorebird Numbers in Wetlands of the Pacific Flyway: A Summary of Spring, Fall, Winter Counts in 1988, 1989, and 1990. 

Miller, A.W., and P.H. Arend. 1960. How to grow watergrass for ducks in California. California Department of Fish and Game, Game Management Leaflet No. 1, Sacramento, 16 pp.

Noss, R.F. 1994. Translating conservation principles to landscape design for the Grassland Water District. Report to Grassland Water District, Los Banos, CA, 27 pp.

Page, G.W., W.D. Shuford, J.E. Kjelmyr, and L.E. Stenzel. 1992. Shorebird Numbers In Wetlands of the Pacific Flyway: A Summary of Counts From April 1988 to January 1992. Point Reyes Bird Observatory. Stinson Beach, CA, 42 pp.

Page, G.W., W.D. Shuford, J.E. Kjelmyr. 1994. Results of the April, August, and November 1993 Shorebird Counts in the Wetlands of California’s Central Valley. Point Reyes Bird Observatory. Stinson Beach, CA, 11 pp.

Rathbun, G.B., N.J. Scott Jr., and T.G Murphy. 2002. Terrestrial habitat use by Pacific pond turtles in a Mediterranean climate.  The Southwestern Naturalist 47(2):225-235.

Reid, T. 1995. Grassland Water District Land Planning Guidance Study. A report to the Grassland Water District. Los Banos, CA, 29 pp.

Severson, D.J. 1987. Macroinvertebrate populations in seasonally flooded marshes of the San Joaquin Valley of California. M.S. Thesis, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 113 pp.

Shuford, W.D., G.W. Page, J.E. Kjelmyr, and C.M. Hickey. 1994. Seasonal Abundance and Habitat Use of Shorebirds in California’s Central Valley, November 1993 to August 1994. Point Reyes Bird Observatory. Stinson Beach, CA, 17 pp.

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Game, and Grasslands Resource Conservation District. 1998. An Interagency Coordinated Program for Wetland Water Use Planning: Central Valley, California. Sacramento, CA.

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 1989. Report on Refuge Water Supply Investigations. Central Valley Hydrologic Basin, California. U.S. Department of Interior, Mid Pacific Region. Sacramento, CA.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Birds of conservation concern 2002. Division of Migratory Bird Management, Arlington, Virginia. 99 pp. 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Central Valley wetlands water supply investigations: CVPIA 3406(d)(6)(A,B): a report to Congress: final report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1978. Concept Plan for Waterfowl Wintering Habitat Preservation, Central Valley, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, OR, 116 pp.

Fish and Wildlife Service. 1989. Wetlands of the California Central Valley: Status and

Trends - 1939 to Mid-1980s. Portland, Oregon, 28pp.

U.S. NABCI Committee. 2000. North American Bird Conservation Initiative: bird conservation region descriptions. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, Virginia. 38 pp.

U.S. NABCI Committee. 2000. North American Bird Conservation Initiative: Bringing it all together. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington, Virginia.

Van Horne B. 1983. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J. Wildl. Manage. 47: 893–901.

Zeiner, D. C., and W. F. Laudenslayer, K. E. Mayer, and M. White, eds. California’s Wildlife: Volume II, Birds. California Statewide Wildlife Habitat Relationship System. State of California, The Resources Agency. Sacramento. 731 pp.